Current:Home > ScamsCalifornia lawmakers approve new tax for guns and ammunition to pay for school safety improvements -FundGuru
California lawmakers approve new tax for guns and ammunition to pay for school safety improvements
View
Date:2025-04-22 05:35:59
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California lawmakers on Thursday voted to raise taxes on guns and ammunition and use the money to pay for gun violence prevention programs and security improvements at public schools.
The federal government already taxes the sale of guns and ammunition nationwide. The government gives that money to the states, which spend it on wildlife conservation and hunter safety programs.
California’s proposed tax, if it becomes law, would be 11% — matching the highest tax imposed by the federal government on guns.
Most states don’t have a special tax just for guns. Pennsylvania collects a $3 surcharge on gun sales and uses the money to pay for background checks. Fees in California total more than $37 on gun sales, with most of that money covering the cost of background checks.
The bill — authored by Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel, a Democrat from Encino — cleared the California Senate on Thursday. It has already passed the state Assembly, but Assembly members must vote on it one more time before sending it to Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk.
“Don’t let politics stand in the way of saving the lives of our children and providing mental health care in our school districts,” Democratic state Sen. Anthony Portantino said. “Fear should not be on the brow of a parent when they send their kids to school.”
It’s unclear if Newsom will sign it into law. Newsom has opposed some high-profile tax increase proposals in recent years. But he has also been on a crusade to improve gun safety, signing a law last year that lets private citizens enforce the state’s ban on assault weapons by filing civil lawsuits against anyone who distributes the weapons, parts that can be used to build the weapons, guns without serial numbers, or .50-caliber rifles.
California’s proposed tax would not apply to people who buy the guns. Instead, the state would make the businesses that sell guns and ammunition pay the tax. However, most of the time businesses will raise prices to cover the cost of the tax. The tax would not apply to police officers and it would not apply to businesses with sales of less than $5,000 over a three-month period.
“It’s a poll tax. It’s a tax on exercising a constitutional right,” said Chuck Michel, president of the California Rifle and Pistol Association, who opposes the tax. “We’re going to have to file a lawsuit to challenge it.”
The federal tax on guns and ammunition has been in place since 1918 and has survived multiple lawsuits. But things changed last year when the U.S. Supreme Court imposed a new standard for interpreting the nation’s gun laws. The new standard relies more on the historical tradition of gun regulation rather than public interests, including safety.
A legislative analysis of the California proposal said it is an “open question” whether a lawsuit challenging the tax would be successful.
The tax would take effect on July 1 and would generate about $159 million in revenue annually, according to an estimate from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. The first $75 million of that money would go to the California Violence Intervention and Prevention Grant Program. In 2020, the program funded projects targeting young people in gangs, including sports programs, life coaching and tattoo removal.
The next $50 million would go to the State Department of Education to enhance safety at public schools, including physical security improvements, safety assessments, after-school programs for at-risk students and mental and behavioral health services for students, teachers and other school employees.
___
Associated Press reporter Trân Nguyễn contributed to this report.
veryGood! (9332)
Related
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Baltimore’s ‘Catastrophic Failures’ at Wastewater Treatment Have Triggered a State Takeover, a Federal Lawsuit and Citizen Outrage
- As the Biden Administration Eyes Wind Leases Off California’s Coast, the Port of Humboldt Sees Opportunity
- To save money on groceries, try these tips before going to the store
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Can Wolves and Beavers Help Save the West From Global Warming?
- Bromelia Swimwear Will Help You Make a Splash on National Bikini Day
- Insurance firms need more climate change information. Scientists say they can help
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- In a Bid to Save Its Coal Industry, Wyoming Has Become a Test Case for Carbon Capture, but Utilities are Balking at the Pricetag
Ranking
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- In a historic step, strippers at an LA bar unionize
- Ron DeSantis debuts presidential bid in a glitch-ridden Twitter 'disaster'
- Peloton is recalling nearly 2.2 million bikes due to a seat hazard
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- With Build Back Better Stalled, Expanded Funding for a Civilian Climate Corps Hangs in the Balance
- Max streaming service says it will restore writer and director credits after outcry
- A New, Massive Plastics Plant in Southwest Pennsylvania Barely Registers Among Voters
Recommendation
New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
An Energy Transition Needs Lots of Power Lines. This 1970s Minnesota Farmers’ Uprising Tried to Block One. What Can it Teach Us?
A Fear of Gentrification Turns Clearing Lead Contamination on Atlanta’s Westside Into a ‘Two-Edged Sword’ for Residents
Red States Still Pose a Major Threat to Biden’s Justice40 Initiative, Activists Warn
Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
In a Bid to Save Its Coal Industry, Wyoming Has Become a Test Case for Carbon Capture, but Utilities are Balking at the Pricetag
A New, Massive Plastics Plant in Southwest Pennsylvania Barely Registers Among Voters
Is AI a job-killer or an up-skiller?